Readiness report
The honest map: where AI fits your operation, where it does not, and the reasoning behind both.
The AI Readiness Review is a fixed-scope diagnostic for mission-critical operators. It maps where AI belongs in your operation, where it does not, and what has to be true before anything goes near live systems.
Everyone is selling you AI. Almost nobody on your side can independently test what is real.
In mission-critical operations, adopting the wrong system, or the right system in the wrong place, is not a pilot that failed. It is an operational incident waiting for a date. The Review exists to move that test to your side of the table.
A structured diagnostic of your operation's readiness for AI: the systems, the data, the decisions, and the people who own them. It answers three questions in plain language. Where does AI genuinely fit? Where does it not, and why? And what has to change before any of it earns access to live operations.
Remote-first, scheduled around your operation. An on-site block can be added where access allows.
The honest map: where AI fits your operation, where it does not, and the reasoning behind both.
The claims on your desk, tested against your operational constraints rather than the demo environment.
Sequenced next steps with effort and risk made visible, so the order of work is a decision, not an accident.
Ninety minutes with your leadership team. Plain language, direct answers, no slides for the sake of slides.
Not an implementation project. Not a vendor pitch. Not a transformation roadmap with a logo on it. There are no tools to buy and no follow-on obligation. The report stands on its own, and it is yours.
Days 1 to 5
Documents, structured interviews, systems and data review. We work from what your operation actually runs on, not from an assumption of it.
Days 6 to 10
Findings tested, report written, action map sequenced. The engagement closes with the executive briefing, not with an invoice and silence.
Two weeks of effort, delivered within a six-week window of kick-off. Scheduled around your operation, not against it.
USD 15,000
Fixed fee. No day rates, no scope drift.
A founding-client rate is available for a nameable reference engagement. If the Review surfaces work worth continuing, a fractional advisory retainer is the natural next step. That is a separate decision, made after the report is in your hands.
Thirty years delivering mission-critical infrastructure, and an AI practitioner since 2020, before it was a boardroom topic. HML builds and verifies these systems hands-on, which is why the Review can tell you what will survive contact with your operation. We do not resell technology, and we take no commission from anyone who does.
For a diagnostic, yes, because the scope is fixed and the method is rehearsed. The two weeks of effort are delivered within a six-week calendar window, so interviews and document access fit around your operation. It is deliberately not enough for implementation. That boundary is the point.
No. The Review is remote-first and built around documents, interviews and systems review. Where badge access and scheduling allow, an on-site block strengthens the findings, but it is optional by design.
Whatever you decide. Some clients act on the map internally. Some continue with a fractional advisory retainer. There is no obligation either way, and the report is written to stand alone.
Airports and airport systems first, because that is where the delivery record is deepest. The method applies to any mission-critical operation where downtime has consequences: logistics, data centres, utilities, transport.
Tell us what is on your desk. We will tell you, within two weeks, what deserves to be there.